VANCOUVER, B.C. – A decades-old technique – fecal transplantation – cures more than 90% of C. difficile patients who relapse after antibiotic therapy, as up to a third do, according to Dr. Johan Bakken.
In fecal transplantation, donor stool is delivered from below through a colonoscope or retention enema, or from above through a nasogastric or nasoduodenal tube, to replace colonic flora wiped out by antibiotics, reestablishing the patient’s resistance to colonization by C. difficile.
To date, at least 159 cases have been reported in the literature, dating back to 1958. Cure rates in case series range from 50% to 100%, with most toward the higher end of the scale, and an overall success rate of 91% (Euro. Surveill. 2009;14:19316).
"Why do it? Because it works," Dr. Johan Bakken, an infectious disease specialist at St. Luke’s Hospital in Duluth, Minn., said at the annual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
"It’s a simple and logical replacement therapy that works when antibiotic therapy fails, with a greater than 90% success rate. It’s safe, inexpensive, reimbursable, quick, and easy to perform. The first bowel movement afterward is normal within 24 hours," he said.
Among the severely ill, he said, "I have not encountered any patients who have not welcomed it."
In one case series, patients reported rapid resolution of abdominal pain, normalization of stool frequency and consistency, and an increased sense of well-being within 24-48 hours (Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003;36:580-5).
A randomized trial is currently underway in the Netherlands pitting vancomycin therapy against nasoduodenal tube fecal transplantation for recurrent C. difficile infections (Euro. Surveill. 2009;14:19316).
Dr. Bakken made his comments during a debate about fecal transplantation’s merits with Dr. Dale N. Gerding, professor of medicine at Loyola University, Chicago.
Tapered, pulsed, and intermittent vancomycin are other options, though success varies, Dr. Gerding said.
Researchers are also working on antibiotics less punishing to healthy gut flora than vancomycin, synthetic stool preparations to avoid the use of donor stool, nontoxigenic C. difficile to outcolonize toxic strains, and vaccines and antibodies to bolster immune responses to the pathogen.
"This is 2010, not 1910. We can do better than fecal transplantation," Dr. Gerding said.
Even so, there is "no question that [fecal transplantation] results are impressive even without controlled, randomized, and blinded trials," he said.
"The cost of goods is low, unlikely to be in short supply, and unlikely to be addictive. It is obvious that feces have the right stuff," Dr. Gerding said.
Dr. Bakken recently published a review of the fecal transplantation literature and described his technique for the procedure (Anaerobe 2009;15:285-9). His medical group in Duluth has performed transplants in more than 80 patients, he said.
Although donor stool was delivered through a colonoscope or retention enema in about three-quarters of published cases, Dr. Bakken prefers the nasogastric tube for instillation.
It’s less messy and guarantees delivery of bacteria to the entire gut, and one instillation is usually enough. Far less donor stool is needed, as well; up to 200 g of donor stool must be delivered from below, and often more than once.
Submitting your vote...
